write-reviewWrite A Reviewdownload-appDownload App
India's Favourite Wedding Planning Platform
All Cities
Yes Media

Yes Media

Sanganer, Jaipur (View on Map)
No reviews
Contact
8 Photos
Shortlist
Write a Review

Projects

About

Reviews

Starting Price

300,000-2,000,000

 per event

Indoor Budget (250 pax)

500,000-2,500,000

 per event

Outdoor Budget (250 pax)

300,000

Banquet Decor Price
Send Message
View Contact

Hi Yes Media,

Notify me on Whatsapp

Send Message
Complete information ensures you get accurate and timely vendor responses
Report Inaccurate Info

Browse Similar Vendors

View All
vendor-picHandpicked

Jaipur

75 reviews

3,00,000 onwards

vendor-picPopular

Jaipur

45 reviews

1,00,000 onwards

vendor-picHandpicked

Panchyawala, Jaipur

24 reviews

50,000 onwards

genie_banner

About Yes Media - Wedding Decorators,  Sanganer Jaipur

A wedding decorator that is sure to delight your mind with the quality and creativity of their work, that's Yes Media for you in a sentence! Based out of Nimaan Nagar in Jaipur, Rajasthan, Yes Media has tons of experience providing amazing setups for weddings. They have a team that loves what they do and pour their heart into the task. The team is led by Mr. Sultan Shah who is an expert in the field. If you have a positive vibe about them, be sure to give them the privilege of making your special day literally special! Services Provided: Stage Decoration Seating Decoration Draping Lighting Floral Decoration
Been on WedMeGood Since

5 years 8 months

No Reviews
Be the first one to post a review

Review Yes Media

Rate Vendor*

Add Photos
Submit Review
vendor-picPopular
4.9(23 reviews)

Location

Jaipur

60,000 onwards

Home function decor 70000

Professionalism : 11 votes

+1 more

vendor-picHandpicked
4.8(23 reviews)

Location

Jaipur

1,00,000 onwards

Classy Elegance : 15 votes

vendor-picPopular

Location

Sanganer

75,000-3,00,000

Home function decor 50000

vendor-pic
3.9(38 reviews)

Location

Vaishali Nagar

1,00,000 onwards

Home function decor 50000

Value for money : 12 votes